美国公司法证券法历年经典论文列表_跟证券法有关的论文

美国公司法证券法历年经典论文列表由刀豆文库小编整理，希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便，猜你可能喜欢“跟证券法有关的论文”。

美国是世界上公司法、证券法研究最为发达的国家之一，在美国法学期刊（Law Review & Journals）上每年发表400多篇以公司法和证券法为主题的论文。自1994年开始，美国的公司法学者每年会投票从中遴选出10篇左右重要的论文，重印于Corporate Practice Commentator，至2008年，已经评选了15年，计177篇论文入选。

以下是每年入选的论文列表：

2008年（以第一作者姓名音序为序）：

1.Anabtawi, Iman and Lynn Stout.Fiduciary duties for activist shareholders.60 Stan.L.Rev.1255-1308(2008).2.Brummer, Chris.Corporate law preemption in an age of global capital markets.81 S.Cal.L.Rev.1067-1114(2008).3.Choi, Stephen and Marcel Kahan.The market penalty for mutual fund scandals.87 B.U.L.Rev.1021-1057(2007).4.Choi, Stephen J.and Jill E.Fisch.On beyond CalPERS: Survey evidence on the developing role of public pension funds in corporate governance.61 Vand.L.Rev.315-354(2008).5.Cox, James D., Randall S.Thomas and Lynn Bai.There are plaintiffs and…there are plaintiffs: An empirical analysis of securities cla action settlements.61 Vand.L.Rev.355-386(2008).6.Henderson, M.Todd.Paying CEOs in bankruptcy: Executive compensation when agency costs are low.101 Nw.U.L.Rev.1543-1618(2007).7.Hu, Henry T.C.and Bernard Black.Equity and debt decoupling and empty voting II: Importance and extensions.156 U.Pa.L.Rev.625-739(2008).8.Kahan, Marcel and Edward Rock.The hanging chads of corporate voting.96 Geo.L.J.1227-1281(2008).9.Strine, Leo E., Jr.Toward common sense and common ground? Reflections on the shared interests of managers and labor in a more rational system of corporate governance.33 J.Corp.L.1-20(2007).10.Subramanian, Guhan.Go-shops vs.no-shops in private equity deals: Evidence and implications.63 Bus.Law.729-760(2008).2007年：

1.Baker, Tom and Sean J.Griffith.The Miing Monitor in Corporate Governance: The Directors’ & Officers’ Liability Insurer.95 Geo.L.J.1795-1842(2007).2.Bebchuk, Lucian A.The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise.93 Va.L.Rev.675-732(2007).3.Choi, Stephen J.and Robert B.Thompson.Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes During the First Decade After the PSLRA.106 Colum.L.Rev.1489-1533(2006).4.Coffee, John C., Jr.Reforming the Securities Cla Action: An Eay on Deterrence and Its Implementation.106 Colum.L.Rev.1534-1586(2006).5.Cox, James D.and Randall S.Thomas.Does the Plaintiff Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Cla Actions.106 Colum.L.Rev.1587-1640(2006).6.Eisenberg, Theodore and Geoffrey Miller.Ex Ante Choice of Law and Forum: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Merger Agreements.59 Vand.L.Rev.1975-2013(2006).7.Gordon, Jeffrey N.The Rise of Independent Directors in the United States, 1950-2005: Of Shareholder Value and Stock Market Prices.59 Stan.L.Rev.1465-1568(2007).8.Kahan, Marcel and Edward B.Rock.Hedge Funds in Corporate Governance and Corporate Control.155 U.Pa.L.Rev.1021-1093(2007).9.Langevoort, Donald C.The Social Construction of Sarbanes-Oxley.105 Mich.L.Rev.1817-1855(2007).10.Roe, Mark J.Legal Origins, Politics, and Modern Stock Markets.120 Harv.L.Rev.460-527(2006).11.Subramanian, Guhan.Post-Siliconix Freeze-outs: Theory and Evidence.36 J.Legal Stud.1-26(2007).(NOTE: This is an earlier working draft.The published article is not freely available, and at SLW we generally respect the intellectual property rights of others.)

2006年：

1.Bainbridge, Stephen M.Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment.119 Harv.L.Rev.1735-1758(2006).2.Bebchuk, Lucian A.Letting Shareholders Set the Rules.119 Harv.L.Rev.1784-1813(2006).3.Black, Bernard, Brian Cheffins and Michael Klausner.Outside Director Liability.58 Stan.L.Rev.1055-1159(2006).4.Choi, Stephen J., Jill E.Fisch and A.C.Pritchard.Do Institutions Matter? The Impact of the Lead Plaintiff Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.83 5.Cox, James D.and Randall S.Thomas.Letting Billions Slip Through Your Fingers: Empirical Evidence and Legal Implications of the Failure of Financial Institutions to Participate in Securities Cla Action Settlements.58 Stan.L.Rev.411-454(2005).6.Gilson, Ronald J.Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy.119 Harv.L.Rev.1641-1679(2006).7.Goshen , Zohar and Gideon Parchomovsky.The Eential Role of Securities Regulation.55 Duke L.J.711-782(2006).8.Hansmann, Henry, Reinier Kraakman and Richard Squire.Law and the Rise of the Firm.119 Harv.L.Rev.1333-1403(2006).9.Hu, Henry T.C.and Bernard Black.Empty Voting and Hidden(Morphable)Ownership: Taxonomy, Implications, and Reforms.61 Bus.Law.1011-1070(2006).10.Kahan, Marcel.The Demand for Corporate Law: Statutory Flexibility, Judicial Quality, or Takeover Protection? 22 J.L.Econ.& Org.340-365(2006).11.Kahan, Marcel and Edward Rock.Symbiotic Federalism and the Structure of Corporate Law.58 Vand.L.Rev.1573-1622(2005).12.Smith, D.Gordon.The Exit Structure of Venture Capital.53 UCLA L.Rev.315-356(2005).2005年：

1.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye.The case for increasing shareholder power.118 Harv.L.Rev.833-914(2005).2.Bratton, William W.The new dividend puzzle.93 Geo.L.J.845-895(2005).3.Elhauge, Einer.Sacrificing corporate profits in the public interest.80 N.Y.U.L.Rev.733-869(2005).4.Johnson,.Corporate officers and the busine judgment rule.60 Bus.Law.439-469(2005).5.Milhaupt, Curtis J.In the shadow of Delaware? The rise of hostile takeovers in Japan.105 Colum.L.Rev.2171-2216(2005).6.Ribstein, Larry E.Are partners fiduciaries? 2005 U.Ill.L.Rev.209-251.7.Roe, Mark J.Delaware?s politics.118 Harv.L.Rev.2491-2543(2005).8.Romano, Roberta.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance.114 Yale L.J.1521-1611(2005).9.Subramanian, Guhan.Fixing freezeouts.115 Yale L.J.2-70(2005).10.Thompson, Robert B.and Randall S.Thomas.The public and private faces of derivative lawsuits.57 Vand.L.Rev.1747-1793(2004).11.Wei, Elliott J.and J.White.File early, then free ride: How Delaware law(mis)shapes shareholder cla actions.57 Vand.L.Rev.1797-1881(2004).2004年：

1Arlen, Jennifer and Eric Talley.Unregulable defenses and the perils of shareholder choice.152 U.Pa.L.Rev.577-666(2003).2.Bainbridge, Stephen M.The busine judgment rule as abstention doctrine.57 Vand.L.Rev.83-130(2004).3.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye and Alma Cohen.Firms' decisions where to incorporate.46 J.L.& Econ.383-425(2003).4.Blair, Margaret M.Locking in capital: what corporate law achieved for busine organizers in the nineteenth century.51 UCLA L.Rev.387-455(2003).5.Gilson, Ronald J.and Jeffrey N.Gordon.Controlling shareholders.152 U.Pa.L.Rev.785-843(2003).6.Roe, Mark J.Delaware 's competition.117 Harv.L.Rev.588-646(2003).7.Sale, Hillary A.Delaware 's good faith.89 Cornell L.Rev.456-495(2004).8.Stout, Lynn A.The mechanisms of market inefficiency: an introduction to the new finance.28 J.Corp.L.635-669(2003).9.Subramanian, Guhan.Bargaining in the shadow of takeover defenses.113 Yale L.J.621-686(2003).10.Subramanian, Guhan.The disappearing Delaware effect.20 J.L.Econ.& Org.32-59(2004)11.Thompson, Robert B.and Randall S.Thomas.The new look of shareholder litigation: acquisition-oriented cla actions.57 Vand.L.Rev.133-209(2004).2003年：

1.Ayres, Ian and Stephen Choi.Internalizing outsider trading.101 Mich.L.Rev.313-408(2002).2.Bainbridge, Stephen M.Director primacy: The means and ends of corporate governance.97 Nw.U.L.Rev.547-606(2003).3.Bebchuk, Lucian, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell.Does the evidence favor state competition in corporate law? 90 Cal.L.Rev.1775-1821(2002).4.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, John C.Coates IV and Guhan Subramanian.The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further findings and a reply to symposium participants.55 Stan.L.Rev.885-917(2002).5.Choi, Stephen J.and Jill E.Fisch.How to fix Wall Street: A voucher financing proposal for securities intermediaries.113 Yale L.J.269-346(2003).6.Daines, Robert.The incorporation choices of IPO firms.77 N.Y.U.L.Rev.1559-1611(2002).7.Gilson, Ronald J.and David M.Schizer.Understanding venture capital structure: A tax explanation for convertible preferred stock.116 Harv.L.Rev.874-916(2003).8.Kahan, Marcel and Ehud Kamar.The myth of state competition in corporate law.55 Stan.L.Rev.679-749(2002).9.Langevoort, Donald C.Taming the animal spirits of the stock markets: A behavioral approach to securities regulation.97 Nw.U.L.Rev.135-188(2002).10.Pritchard, A.C.Justice Lewis F.Powell, Jr., and the counterrevolution in the federal securities laws.52 Duke L.J.841-949(2003).11.Thompson, Robert B.and Hillary A.Sale.Securities fraud as corporate governance: Reflections upon federalism.56 Vand.L.Rev.859-910(2003).2002年：

1.Allen, William T., Jack B.Jacobs and Leo E.Strine, Jr.Function over Form: A Reaement of Standards of Review in Delaware Corporation Law.26 Del.J.Corp.L.859-895(2001)and 56 Bus.Law.1287(2001).2.Ayres, Ian and Joe Bankman.Substitutes for Insider Trading.54 Stan.L.Rev.235-254(2001).3.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Jee M.Fried and David I.Walker.Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation.69 U.Chi.L.Rev.751-846(2002).4.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, John C.Coates IV and Guhan Subramanian.The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy.54 Stan.L.Rev.887-951(2002).5.Black, Bernard and Reinier Kraakman.Delaware’s Takeover Law: The Uncertain Search for Hidden Value.96 Nw.U.L.Rev.521-566(2002).6.Bratton, William M.Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value.76 Tul.L.Rev.1275-1361(2002).7.Coates, John C.IV.Explaining Variation in Takeover Defenses: Blame the Lawyers.89 Cal.L.Rev.1301-1421(2001).8.Kahan, Marcel and Edward B.Rock.How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Pill: Adaptive Responses to Takeover Law.69 U.Chi.L.Rev.871-915(2002).9.Kahan, Marcel.Rethinking Corporate Bonds: The Trade-off Between Individual and Collective Rights.77 N.Y.U.L.Rev.1040-1089(2002).10.Roe, Mark J.Corporate Law’s Limits.31 J.Legal Stud.233-271(2002).11.Thompson, Robert B.and D.Gordon Smith.Toward a New Theory of the Shareholder Role: “Sacred Space” in Corporate Takeovers.80 Tex.L.Rev.261-326(2001).2001年：

1.Black, Bernard S.The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets.48 UCLA L.Rev.781-855(2001).2.Coates, John C.IV.Takeover defenses in the shadow of the pill: a critique of the scientific evidence.79 Tex.L.Rev.271-382(2000).3.Coates, John C.IV and Guhan Subramanian.A buy-side model of M&A lockups: theory and evidence.53 Stan.L.Rev.307-396(2000).4.Coffee, John C., Jr.The rise of dispersed ownership: the roles of law and the state in the separation of ownership and control.111 Yale L.J.1-82(2001).5.Choi, Stephen J.The unfounded fear of Regulation S: empirical evidence on offshore securities offerings.50 Duke L.J.663-751(2000).6.Daines, Robert and Michael Klausner.Do IPO charters maximize firm value? Antitakeover protection in IPOs.17 J.L.Econ.& Org.83-120(2001).7.Hansmann, Henry and Reinier Kraakman.The eential role of organizational law.110 Yale L.J.387-440(2000).8.Langevoort, Donald C.The human nature of corporate boards: law, norms, and the unintended consequences of independence and accountability.89 Geo.L.J.797-832(2001).9.Mahoney, Paul G.The political economy of the Securities Act of 1933.30 J.Legal Stud.1-31(2001).10.Roe, Mark J.Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control.53 Stan.L.Rev.539-606(2000).11.Romano, Roberta.Le is more: making institutional investor activism a valuable mechanism of corporate governance.18 Yale J.on Reg.174-251(2001).2000年：

1.Bratton, William W.and Joseph A.McCahery.Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm: The Case Against Global Cro Reference.38 Colum.J.Transnat’l L.213-297(1999).2.Coates, John C.IV.Empirical Evidence on Structural Takeover Defenses: Where Do We Stand? 54 U.Miami L.Rev.783-797(2000).3.Coffee, John C., Jr.Privatization and Corporate Governance: The Leons from Securities Market Failure.25 J.Corp.L.1-39(1999).4.Fisch, Jill E.The Peculiar Role of the Delaware Courts in the Competition for Corporate Charters.68 U.Cin.L.Rev.1061-1100(2000).5.Fox, Merritt B.Retained Mandatory Securities Disclosure: Why Iuer Choice Is Not Investor Empowerment.85 Va.L.Rev.1335-1419(1999).6.Fried, Jee M.Insider Signaling and Insider Trading with Repurchase Tender Offers.67 U.Chi.L.Rev.421-477(2000).7.Gulati, G.Mitu, William A.Klein and Eric M.Zolt.Connected Contracts.47 UCLA L.Rev.887-948(2000).8.Hu, Henry T.C.Faith and Magic: Investor Beliefs and Government Neutrality.78 Tex.L.Rev.777-884(2000).9.Moll, Douglas K.Shareholder Oppreion in Close Corporations: The Unanswered Question of Perspective.53 Vand.L.Rev.749-827(2000).10.Schizer, David M.Executives and Hedging: The Fragile Legal Foundation of Incentive Compatibility.100 Colum.L.Rev.440-504(2000).11.Smith, Thomas A.The Efficient Norm for Corporate Law: A Neotraditional Interpretation of Fiduciary Duty.98 Mich.L.Rev.214-268(1999).12.Thomas, Randall S.and Kenneth J.Martin.The Determinants of Shareholder Voting on Stock Option Plans.35 Wake Forest L.Rev.31-81(2000).13.Thompson, Robert B.Preemption and Federalism in Corporate Governance: Protecting Shareholder Rights to Vote, Sell, and Sue.62 Law & Contemp.Probs.215-242(1999).1999年（以第一作者姓名音序为序）：

1.Bankman, Joseph and Ronald J.Gilson.Why Start-ups? 51 Stan.L.Rev.289-308(1999).2.Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black.The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance.54 Bus.Law.921-963(1999).3.Blair, Margaret M.and Lynn A.Stout.A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law.85 Va.L.Rev.247-328(1999).4.Coates, John C., IV.“Fair Value” As an Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law: Minority Discounts in Conflict Transactions.147 U.Pa.L.Rev.1251-1359(1999).5.Coffee, John C., Jr.The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications.93 Nw.U.L.Rev.641-707(1999).6.Eisenberg, Melvin A.Corporate Law and Social Norms.99 Colum.L.Rev.1253-1292(1999).7.Hamermesh, Lawrence A.Corporate Democracy and Stockholder-Adopted By-laws: Taking Back the Street? 73 Tul.L.Rev.409-495(1998).8.Krawiec, Kimberly D.Derivatives, Corporate Hedging, and Shareholder Wealth: Modigliani-Miller Forty Years Later.1998 U.Ill.L.Rev.1039-1104.9.Langevoort, Donald C.Rereading Cady, Roberts: The Ideology and Practice of Insider Trading Regulation.99 Colum.L.Rev.1319-1343(1999).10.Langevoort, Donald C.Half-Truths: Protecting Mistaken Inferences By Investors and Others.52 Stan.L.Rev.87-125(1999).11.Talley, Eric.Turning Servile Opportunities to Gold: A Strategic Analysis of the Corporate Opportunities Doctrine.108 Yale L.J.277-375(1998).12.Williams, Cynthia A.The Securities and Exchange Commiion and Corporate Social Transparency.112 Harv.L.Rev.1197-1311(1999).1998年：

1.Carney, William J., The Production of Corporate Law, 71 S.Cal.L.Rev.715-780(1998).2.Choi, Stephen, Market Leons for Gatekeepers, 92 Nw.U.L.Rev.916-966(1998).3.Coffee, John C., Jr., Brave New World?: The Impact(s)of the Internet on Modern Securities Regulation.52 Bus.Law.1195-1233(1997).4.Langevoort, Donald C., Organized Illusions: A Behavioral Theory of Why Corporations Mislead Stock Market Investors(and Cause Other Social Harms).146 U.Pa.L.Rev.101-172(1997).5.Langevoort, Donald C., The Epistemology of Corporate-Securities Lawyering: Beliefs, Biases and Organizational Behavior.63 Brook.L.Rev.629-676(1997).6.Mann, Ronald J.The Role of Secured Credit in Small-Busine Lending.86 Geo.L.J.1-44(1997).7.Milhaupt, Curtis J., Property Rights in Firms.84 Va.L.Rev.1145-1194(1998).8.Rock, Edward B., Saints and Sinners: How Does Delaware Corporate Law Work? 44 UCLA L.Rev.1009-1107(1997).9.Romano, Roberta, Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation.107 Yale L.J.2359-2430(1998).10.Schwab, Stewart J.and Randall S.Thomas, Realigning Corporate Governance: Shareholder Activism by Labor Unions.96 Mich.L.Rev.1018-1094(1998).11.Skeel, David A., Jr., An Evolutionary Theory of Corporate Law and Corporate Bankruptcy.51 Vand.L.Rev.1325-1398(1998).12.Thomas, Randall S.and Martin, Kenneth J., Should Labor Be Allowed to Make Shareholder Proposals? 73 Wash.L.Rev.41-80(1998).1997年：

1.Alexander, Janet Cooper, Rethinking Damages in Securities Cla Actions, 48 Stan.L.Rev.1487-1537(1996).2.Arlen, Jennifer and Kraakman, Reinier, Controlling Corporate Misconduct: An Analysis of Corporate Liability Regimes, 72 N.Y.U.L.Rev.687-779(1997).3.Brudney, Victor, Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law, 38 B.C.L.Rev.595-665(1997).4.Carney, William J., The Political Economy of Competition for Corporate Charters, 26 J.Legal Stud.303-329(1997).5.Choi, Stephen J., Company Registration: Toward a Status-Based Antifraud Regime, 64 U.Chi.L.Rev.567-651(1997).6.Fox, Merritt B., Securities Disclosure in a Globalizing Market: Who Should Regulate Whom.95 Mich.L.Rev.2498-2632(1997).7.Kahan, Marcel and Klausner, Michael, Lockups and the Market for Corporate Control, 48 Stan.L.Rev.1539-1571(1996).8.Mahoney, Paul G., The Exchange as Regulator, 83 Va.L.Rev.1453-1500(1997).9.Milhaupt, Curtis J., The Market for Innovation in the United States and Japan: Venture Capital and the Comparative Corporate Governance Debate, 91 Nw.U.L.Rev.865-898(1997).10.Skeel, David A., Jr., The Unanimity Norm in Delaware Corporate Law, 83 Va.L.Rev.127-175(1997).1996年：

1.Black, Bernard and Reinier Kraakman A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law, 109 Harv.L.Rev.1911(1996)2.Gilson, Ronald J.Corporate Governance and Economic Efficiency: When Do Institutions Matter?, 74 Wash.U.L.Q.327(1996)3.Hu, Henry T.C.Hedging Expectations: “Derivative Reality” and the Law and Finance of the Corporate Objective, 21 J.Corp.L.3(1995)4.Kahan, Marcel & Michael Klausner Path Dependence in Corporate Contracting: Increasing Returns, Herd Behavior and Cognitive Biases, 74 Wash.U.L.Q.347(1996)5.Kitch, Edmund W.The Theory and Practice of Securities Disclosure, 61 Brooklyn L.Rev.763(1995)6.Langevoort, Donald C.Selling Hope, Selling Risk: Some Leons for Law From Behavioral Economics About Stockbrokers and Sophisticated Customers, 84 Cal.L.Rev.627(1996)7.Lin, Laura The Effectivene of Outside Directors as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Theories and Evidence, 90 Nw.U.L.Rev.898(1996)8.Millstein, Ira M.The Profeional Board, 50 Bus.Law 1427(1995)9.Thompson, Robert B.Exit, Liquidity, and Majority Rule: Appraisal's Role in Corporate Law, 84 Geo.L.J.1(1995)10.Triantis, George G.and Daniels, Ronald J.The Role of Debt in Interactive Corporate Governance.83 Cal.L.Rev.1073(1995)

1995年： 公司法： 1.Arlen, Jennifer and Deborah M.Wei A Political Theory of Corporate Taxation,.105 Yale L.J.325-391(1995).2.Elson, Charles M.The Duty of Care, Compensation, and Stock Ownership, 63 U.Cin.L.Rev.649(1995).3.Hu, Henry T.C.Heeding Expectations: “Derivative Reality” and the Law and Finance of the Corporate Objective, 73 Tex.L.Rev.985-1040(1995).4.Kahan, Marcel The Qualified Case Against Mandatory Terms in Bonds, 89 Nw.U.L.Rev.565-622(1995).5.Klausner, Michael Corporations, Corporate Law, and Networks of Contracts, 81 Va.L.Rev.757-852(1995).6.Mitchell, Lawrence E.Cooperation and Constraint in the Modern Corporation: An Inquiry Into the Causes of Corporate Immorality, 73 Tex.L.Rev.477-537(1995).7.Siegel, Mary Back to the Future: Appraisal Rights in the Twenty-First Century, 32 Harv.J.on Legis.79-143(1995).证券法：

1.Grundfest, Joseph A.Why Disimply? 108 Harv.L.Rev.727-747(1995).2.Lev, Baruch and Meiring de Villiers Stock Price Crashes and 10b-5 Damages: A Legal Economic, and Policy Analysis, 47 Stan.L.Rev.7-37(1994).3.Mahoney, Paul G.Mandatory Disclosure as a Solution to Agency Problems, 62 U.Chi.L.Rev.1047-1112(1995).4.Seligman, Joel The Merits Do Matter, 108 Harv.L.Rev.438(1994).5.Seligman, Joel The Obsolescence of Wall Street: A Contextual Approach to the Evolving Structure of Federal Securities Regulation, 93 Mich.L.Rev.649-702(1995).6.Stout, Lynn A.Are Stock Markets Costly Casinos? Disagreement, Mark Failure, and Securities Regulation, 81 Va.L.Rev.611(1995).7.Wei, Elliott J.and John S.Beckerman Let the Money Do the Monitoring: How Institutional Investors Can Reduce Agency Costs in Securities Cla Actions, 104 Yale L.J.2053-2127(1995).1994年： 公司法：

1.Fraidin, Stephen and Hanson, Jon D.Toward Unlocking Lockups, 103 Yale L.J.1739-1834(1994)2.Gordon, Jeffrey N.Institutions as Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting, 94 Colum.L.Rev.124-192(1994)3.Karpoff, Jonathan M., and Lott, John R., Jr.The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear From Committing Criminal Fraud, 36 J.L.& Econ.757-802(1993)4.Kraakman, Reiner, Park, Hyun, and Shavell, Steven When Are Shareholder Suits in Shareholder Interests?, 82 Geo.L.J.1733-1775(1994)5.Mitchell, Lawrence E.Fairne and Trust in Corporate Law, 43 Duke L.J.425-491(1993)6.Oesterle, Dale A.and Palmiter, Alan R.Judicial Schizophrenia in Shareholder Voting Cases, 79 Iowa L.Rev.485-583(1994)

7.Pound, John The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control, 68 N.Y.U.L.Rev.1003-1071(1993)8.Skeel, David A., Jr.Rethinking the Line Between Corporate Law and Corporate Bankruptcy, 72 Tex.L.Rev.471-557(1994)9.Thompson, Robert B.Unpacking Limited Liability: Direct and Vicarious Liability of Corporate Participants for Torts of the Enterprise, 47 Vand.L.Rev.1-41(1994)证券法：

1.Alexander, Janet Cooper The Value of Bad News in Securities Cla Actions, 41 UCLA L.Rev.1421-1469(1994)2.Bainbridge, Stephen M.Insider Trading Under the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers, 19 J.Corp.L.1-40(1993)3.Black, Bernard S.and Coffee, John C.Jr.Hail Britannia?: Institutional Investor Behavior Under Limited Regulation, 92 Mich.L.Rev.1997-2087(1994)4.Booth, Richard A.The Efficient Market, portfolio Theory, and the Downward Sloping Demand Hypothesis, 68 N.Y.U.L.Rev.1187-1212(1993)5.Coffee, John C., Jr.The SEC and the Institutional Investor: A Half-Time Report, 15 Cardozo L.Rev 837-907(1994)6.Fox, Merritt B.Insider Trading Deterrence Versus Managerial Incentives: A Unified Theory of Section 16(b), 92 Mich.L.Rev.2088-2203(1994)7.Grundfest, Joseph A.Disimplying Private Rights of Action Under the Federal Securities Laws: The Commiion's Authority, 107 Harv.L.Rev.961-1024(1994)8.Macey, Jonathan R.Administrative Agency Obsolescence and Interest Group Formation: A Case Study of the SEC at Sixty, 15 Cardozo L.Rev.909-949(1994)9.Rock, Edward B.Controlling the Dark Side of Relational Investing, 15 Cardozo L.Rev.987-1031(1994)