argument113Easy Read course_新概念readthelabel

argument113Easy Read course由刀豆文库小编整理，希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便，猜你可能喜欢“新概念readthelabel”。

The author advises in the argument that Acme Publishing Company should require all its employees to take the Easy Read course to improve productivity.However, there are many logical flaws in the argument and there remain many questions to be answered.All of these defects greatly render the advice unreliable.The threshold problem of the argument lies in that the arguer only mentions two graduates for the Easy Read course to demonstrate the effect of the course, committing the fallacy of hasty generalization.The evidence is far from sufficient to lend strong support to the conclusion.Basically, we only have two facts to deal with: two people attended Easy Read courses and these two people performed well after that.The author provides nothing to illustrate the linking of these two things so we have a good reason to doubt the effect of the courses.The author fails to rule out other poibilities such as these two graduates attended other courses besides Easy Read courses and the effects of other courses are far better than East Read.This scenario, if true, would cast great doubt on the soundne of the advice.Even if the two people quoted are sufficiently representative, still other questions need to be answered by the arguer to better support his or her suggestion.For example, how did the two people mentioned perform before they took the course? More accurately, what is the speed of read before their attendance of the courses? If they could read at the same or even faster speed before the courses, we can definitely conclude that the courses are of little value and the author's advice too.To lend more credibility to the supposed advice, the author might have to take a thorough research to further study the changes caused by the courses of these two people and answer the foregoing questions.In addition, the cost of the advice needs to be carefully considered.Mentioning that the fee is only 500 dollars, the author may have been attempting to persuade us that the cost to send employees to the courses is affordable, thus ignoring the fact that the company will certainly suffer a lot without employees working.The profits that employees can make in three weeks must be considerable and thus cannot be neglected when making decisions whether to send workers to the course.Some may still argue that the course will benefit the company in the long run.However, this conclusion is dubious even we admit that the courses are effective.Considering that employees might not devote all their careers to the company, the company may be at risk of losing both money and employees if all the workers are sent to the course.The question concerning employees' loyalty to the company is to be answered to support the author's advice.Given one sentence to summarize my evaluation, I tent to stre that the reasoning is ripe with holes and questionable aumptions, which greatly deteriorate the soundne of the advice.To better support the argument, the author is suggested to take further research to evaluate the whole situation.Only by answering all the questions mentioned above can the arguer make his advice and reasoning stronger.