孔子老子读后感8_老子和孔子的比较

孔子老子读后感8由刀豆文库小编整理，希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便，猜你可能喜欢“老子和孔子的比较”。

Confucianism and Daoism play an important role on China`s long and fascinating history.The former emphasis on reason, traditional morality, and social philosophy.The later stre on intuition, mystical identification with nature, and endle transformation.The two most important figures in China`s history of thought are Confucius and Laozi.This article stated the difference of Confucianism and Daoism by introducing Confucius and Laozi, and concluded that they formed a system of social values and fulfilled various spiritual and ethical functions very much like those of a religion.However, I don`t agree with the author `s point which Confucianism and Daoism are like a religion in term of these social values and fulfilled various spiritual and ethical functions.My reason is following.Eence of Confucius` teachings lay in his conviction that serving man was equivalent to serving Heaven.Confucius stood in awe of the ultimate source of creativity which works inceantly in the universe and the human world.If religious belief is understood to mean faith in something transcendent that has exerted profound influence on our lives, then Confucius can be regarded as a deeply religious man.However, Laozi is not religious man.Laozi considered that Dao is invisible, inaudible, and intangible, and is the source of heaven and earth and the mother of all things.In the beginning was the Dao, the Dao became Yin and Yang and from these two principles emerged ten thousand things.Although the concepts ,such as the Supreme Being , the Great Dao, occurred in the thought of Laozi, they were different from those in religious.The Supreme Being and the Great Daorefer to some nature law, not the God in religious.They are the natute of all things , being in the things, and isolated.But, God creates all things, human cannot find God in real world.Dao is a property, but God is a thing.Hence, I insist that Confucianism is like those of a religion, but Daoism is not.The author `s opinion is untenable.We should understand precisely concepts of theories, and cannot be too literally.